Most companies don’t suffer from a lack of controls — they suffer from ineffective controls. Documentation exists and audits pass, yet when pressure hits (new markets, M&A, system go-lives), things still break. Gaps are rarely technical; they’re usually operational — rooted in ownership, focus, and feedback.
Three signs your control framework actually works
1) Control outcomes match risk exposure
Why this matters
Strong frameworks align effort with exposure. Your highest-impact risks should be mitigated by your strongest, best-embedded controls — and the evidence should show it in falling exceptions and fewer unanticipated exposures.
Symptoms (you’re on track)
- Exceptions trend down over time in your top risks.
- Board/external queries surface known residual risks, not surprises.
Recommended action
Re-anchor the framework to enterprise risk. Reconfirm top risks with leadership and explicitly link each to a primary control, named owner, and outcome metric — and make that linkage the backbone of your programme and reporting.
Use Internal Control Frameworks to map risks to controls, owners, and assurance measures.
2) Ownership lives in the line
Why this matters
Controls work when they live where the work happens. When Procurement, Sales Ops, AP, and Payroll see controls as integral to performance — not “extra compliance” — execution becomes consistent, timely, and scalable.
Symptoms (you’re on track)
- Controls continue through peaks without chasing or reminders from the Risk and Control function.
- Owners can name and explain their controls and the risk each one addresses.
Recommended action
Shift ownership to the line. Position control execution as a performance expectation for process leaders, supported (not owned) by the Risk and Control function, and embed this accountability in governance, objectives, and scorecards.
Deploy the Process Procedure Kit to embed controls in SOPs and workflows.
3) Exceptions drive improvement
Why this matters
Logs don’t reduce risk; closed loops do. Mature environments treat exceptions as signals for root-cause analysis, targeted remediation, and retesting — building learning and credibility over time.
Symptoms (you’re on track)
- Repeat-exception rate is low and trending downward.
- Remediation shows clear ownership, target dates, and retest evidence.
Recommended action
Make exception management a leadership cadence. Establish a regular forum (e.g., monthly) focused on root causes and system-level fixes so repeats become organisationally unacceptable.
Use Internal Control Tools for decision-grade dashboards and exception tracking.
Two signs of ineffective control frameworks
1) Too many controls — not enough control
Why this matters
Bloat creates friction without assurance. Overlapping checks and serial approvals slow the business, blur ownership, and create a false sense of safety. Fewer, stronger, system-anchored controls provide better assurance with less noise.
Watch out for
- Teams say “we do it for audit” but can’t articulate which risk the control reduces.
- Overlapping or partially overlapping controls exist for the same risk.
Recommended action
Adopt a “less-but-better” stance. Make risk-reduction-per-effort your north star and retire low-value controls to concentrate energy — and leadership attention — on the few that truly mitigate your highest risks.
Run rationalisation with the Implementation Kit templates; re-anchor with Frameworks.
2) Controls are stale — they lag business change
Why this matters
Risk changes faster than paperwork. New channels, entities, ERP modules, outsourcing, or AI reshape the risk profile. If controls don’t refresh with change, they become obsolete fast.
Watch out for
- Exception spikes immediately after system/process changes.
- “Temporary compensating controls” becoming default practice.
Recommended action
Build a change-responsive discipline. Tie control refresh to business change by policy so every material change triggers a leadership-sponsored review of risks, key controls, and assurance measures.
Update RCM/SoD with Frameworks; monitor outcomes with Tools.
To conclude, control excellence isn’t about more testing or thicker binders. It’s about clarity in proportion to risk, ownership in the line, and a proactive approach to closing gaps. When those three are present, your framework provides real assurance — and your leadership can operate with genuine confidence.
Tools to implement fast
- Internal Control Frameworks — risk/control descriptions, RCMs, SoD matrix to identify key controls.
- Internal Control Implementation Kit — plug-and-play templates to rationalise, embed, and operationalise quickly.
- Internal Control Tools — board-grade dashboards and reporting templates for decision-ready metrics.
- Process Procedure Kit — pragmatic SOPs so controls live where the work happens.
Leave a Reply